Back to library
Advanced: govern & scale: Governance, cost, lifecycle and enterprise automationHigh - agents can surface information users are already permitted to access and can also be given additional governed identities, tools or connectors riskNo AI needed

Review agent access, knowledge sources and permissions

An administrator reviews a shared agent's knowledge sources, connectors, users, owner and effective access before wider publication, and repeats the review when the agent's purpose, owner or source data changes.

Where the action happens

Agent 365 / Microsoft 365 admin centre / Entra / Purview

Product or feature needed

Agent access governance and least-privilege review

AI required

No - governance task

Extra credits

No - the review itself does not consume Copilot Credits

Technical skill

High

Risk level

High - agents can surface information users are already permitted to access and can also be given additional governed identities, tools or connectors

Licence dependency

The governance principle applies regardless of licence. Agent 365, Entra, Purview and other controls available to the tenant determine how much of the review can be centralised or automated.

Credit dependency

No Copilot Credits for the governance review itself; the governed agent or actions may have their own consumption model.

UK availability

available

What it can do

  • Checks whether the agent's knowledge sources and connectors are necessary for its stated purpose.
  • Supports least-privilege decisions for agent identities and governed access to Microsoft 365 resources.
  • Helps identify overshared SharePoint or OneDrive content that an agent could make easier to discover and summarise.
  • Creates a repeatable review point when an agent changes owner, purpose, audience, data source, connector or level of autonomy.

Limitations

  • Agents do not automatically fix poor underlying permissions or overshared content; existing SharePoint, OneDrive and data-governance issues still need remediation.
  • A permissions review should distinguish delegated access, where an agent acts within a user's existing access, from agents or tools granted their own governed access.
  • Uploaded or embedded knowledge can have different sharing implications from content that remains permission-trimmed in Microsoft 365; confirm behaviour for the specific agent configuration.

Prerequisites

  • An up-to-date agent inventory with a named owner or sponsor.
  • Access to relevant Microsoft 365, Entra, Purview or workload-specific administration controls.
  • A documented purpose and intended audience for the agent so reviewers can judge whether access is proportionate.

Workarounds

  • Where central Agent 365 controls are unavailable, perform a manual review of the agent's owner, users, SharePoint/OneDrive sources, uploaded files, connectors and external actions, and record the outcome in the governance register.

    No premium licensing needed. External dependency: Governance process.

Notes

Use a least-privilege test: does the agent need this source, connector, audience and permission to perform its approved purpose? Treat agent governance as an extension of existing identity and data governance, not as a replacement for fixing overshared content.

Watch-outs for Advanced: govern & scale

  • Keep detailed governance here rather than repeating it on every beginner capability.
  • Track ownership, access, cost, lifecycle and exceptions once services are shared or business-critical.
  • AI Redlines remain separate from normal governance and should be treated as hard boundaries.

Last checked: 2026-09-15

Disclaimer: Always follow your organisation's internal guidance and policies regarding AI usage. The suggestions in this guide have been created to the best of accuracy, but Microsoft licensing, pricing and feature availability change frequently — treat them as a planning baseline, not a procurement quote.

Community feedback

Has your organisation tried this? Confirm whether it's possible, whether it's useful, and share any tips.

0

Confirmed possible

0

Reported not possible

0

Found it useful

0

Not useful

Add your feedback

Used to verify feedback comes from a real organisation. Never displayed publicly.

Is this possible in practice?

Is it useful?

Loading feedback…